2012/4/20 Bartosz Świątek <shad...@gmail.com>: > W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 22:26 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski > <wrob...@pld-linux.org> napisał: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Caleb Maclennan <ca...@pld-linux.org> wrote: >>>> well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with >>>> appropriate >>>> branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain >>>> that, >>>> which I believe is full time job and lack of resources causes the stable >>>> branch >>>> to freeze. therefore, imho, it is not good idea to link CVS HEAD with >>>> stable >>>> line - and that was the result of similar discussions in the past if i >>>> reckon well. >>>> >>>> if you need more reassurance, then what about introducing TH-STABLE tag and >>>> sending packages to builders only when they are tagged with above? >>> >>> A tag scheme like that could of course work. Again I would ask ask >>> how, other than different tag names, this is different from the status >>> quo. >> >> it is very simple. "th-stable", "ac-stable" or whatever... provide >> meaningful, self documenting names to things. >> >> you want to discuss strategy on CVS HEAD, then... well... you have >> few things to consider > > I really really am confused now. You're pretending your side of the > story is how it's always been done in PLD. It's really not. HEAD was > always reserved for stable package releases.
right... especially in Ra and Ac times... [...] w _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en