W dniu 21 kwietnia 2012 11:39 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski <wrob...@pld-linux.org> napisał: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Pala <go...@polanet.pl> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 22:07:14 +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote: >> >>>> I really really am confused now. You're pretending your side of the >>>> story is how it's always been done in PLD. It's really not. HEAD was >>>> always reserved for stable package releases. >>> >>> right... especially in Ra and Ac times... >> >> Ra and Ac was detached from HEAD when they were released (i.e. frozen). >> Th is not. >> You keep avoiding one simple answer: why don't you want to use DEVEL? >> This is the tag designated _exactly_ for this purpose. > > 1. DEVEL is for unstable versions - we are talking about RC.
And RC is stable? ;) > > 2. the release announcement contains the following statement > > The changes in GIMP 2.8rc1 since 2.7.5 are mostly not > user-visible. We merely > updated the code to work with newer versions of GEGL and babl, fixed GFig > rendering issues and used all the translation updates we got to the point. > > 3. it does not look like there are major issues with 2.8rc1. Justin Bieber looks like a girl. You see, looks can be deceiving. > > 4. on top of that, i have tested it with my workflows before sending > the very first > email proposing the merge on HEAD. Ok, no comment. > > 5. babl and gegl are on HEAD anyway. > > therefore, imho, it is worth _starting_ upgrading (but if you send it > to builders, then > it is your stupidity). > > i was quite often putting rc versions on HEAD (depending on a project > progress). Then you were quite often bending the rules, weren't you? -- "I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en