On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 17:30:04 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >> Thus noone expect this to work or even exists. > > What am I, chopped liver? > > I said exactly that I do not expect --rollback to Just Work, with additional > history/context information regarding the history/rationale on a Mancoosi WP3 > mailing list > when the decision was made to _NOT_ continue with the previous > implementation of --rollback.
Blablabla - for the last time: I don't care. I don't know anyone who cares. If you had no feedback for years, apparently no rpm user cares. We are not talking about SUCH feature. If THIS doesn't work > /dev/null. >>> I do not understand your distinction. >>> >>> How is --rollback to be performed if operations are >>> only partially reversed? >> >> cd /var/spool/repackage; ls | perl -ne 'use Time::Local; my >> ($mday,$mon,$year,$hour,$min,$sec) = split(/[\s.:]+/, "23.04.2012 >> 12:00:00"); my $time = timelocal($sec,$min,$hour,$mday,$mon-1,$year); print >> if $_>=$time' | sort -r | while read dir; do rpm -Uvh --oldpackage --force >> $dir/*; done > > Hint: Your script is utterly useless when the clock isn't/wasn't correct. 1. do you still not understand this distinction? 2. do you know how package manager could restore packages now? 3. "when the disk isn't/wasn't working properly, every solution is utterly useless" 4. I've written this for this conversation as simplest demonstration of what is missing. -- Tomasz Pala <go...@pld-linux.org> _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
