On Sep 23, 2012, at 6:18 PM, Tomasz Pala <[email protected]> wrote: > In this episode... > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 18:03:06 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > >>> he - wants - to - 'rollback' - using - his - repackages. ONLY >> >> troll++ > > ...Jeff-the-Omniscient knows better what user wanted to accomplish!
(troll++)++ >>>> So don't use ACID-style rollback. Alternatively, >>> >>> Which one, this broken? >> >> troll++ > > ...Jeff-almighty can run broken code! > (troll++)++ >>>> You are a deluded idiot claiming that RPM --rollback >>>> is false advertising. >>> >>> Oh, so it was deliberately designed to break, right? >> >> troll++ >> >> Get a grip: PLD decided to upgrade to rpm-5.4.x. > > So is it broken or not? > Depends on whether you were born a bastard (or not). I do not know you genealogy sufficiently well to say whether it is broken or not ... >> Now you can all bugger off ? > > Last time I've checked we were on PLD maillist not rpm one, so if anyone > it's you who should go fuck himself. > troll++ 73 de Jeff > -- > Tomasz Pala <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
