On Sep 23, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 17:45:08 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > >>> The data is not gone - it exists in repackage. The _only_ thing that's >>> missing is some syntax sugar to ease downgrades. >> >> It doesn't exist in /var/spool/repackage if not enabled, >> or when bloat has been manually removed. > > Or when the earth is hit by a meteor. > That's not the case we're talking about. That's funny you still can't > understant, that: > > he - wants - to - 'rollback' - using - his - repackages. ONLY >
troll++ >> So don't use ACID-style rollback. Alternatively, > > Which one, this broken? > troll++ >> You are a deluded idiot claiming that RPM --rollback >> is false advertising. > > Oh, so it was deliberately designed to break, right? > troll++ Get a grip: PLD decided to upgrade to rpm-5.4.x. Now you can all bugger off … 73 de Jeff > -- > Tomasz Pala <go...@pld-linux.org> > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en