On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Wednesday 27 of April 2005 06:00, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > Any objections on reversing Vim's bconds for perl/python/ruby/tcl > > interpreters? If not, than in the name of 'we are feature rich' I am > > going to enable these by default. > > > > At least I am going to enable perl interp, since it adds only perl-base > > R: to few vim packages, and perl-base is already required by vim-rt. > Enable these IMO. There is vim-static for those people who don't want > additional deps.
You don't know what you're talking about. vim-static is /bin/vi and the first thing I do is alias vi=vim because vim-static is just too feature poor. I can live with perl but python/ruby/tcl/etc is just an overkill. If you really want a huge monster with all bells and whistles just do a vim-this-package-requires-a-lot subpackage :/ Janek -- Jan Rękorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
