On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:49:35PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > > > Any objections on reversing Vim's bconds for perl/python/ruby/tcl > > > interpreters? If not, than in the name of 'we are feature rich' I am > > > going to enable these by default. > > > > > > At least I am going to enable perl interp, since it adds only perl-base > > > R: to few vim packages, and perl-base is already required by vim-rt. > > Enable these IMO. There is vim-static for those people who don't want > > additional deps. > > You don't know what you're talking about. vim-static is /bin/vi and the > first thing I do is alias vi=vim because vim-static is just too feature > poor. I can live with perl but python/ruby/tcl/etc is just an overkill.
Perl interp is the one I personally care about, as I have some scripts that depend on it. But why should we promote one interp? We have democracy, equality of rights and all that stuff. > If you really want a huge monster with all bells and whistles just do a > vim-this-package-requires-a-lot subpackage :/ or rather something in between vim-static and vim-ncurses, like vim-minimal. Feel free to add such package, yet I think it is unnecessary. -- http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
