On Wednesday 27 of April 2005 17:49, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 of April 2005 06:00, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > > Any objections on reversing Vim's bconds for perl/python/ruby/tcl > > > interpreters? If not, than in the name of 'we are feature rich' I am > > > going to enable these by default. > > > > > > At least I am going to enable perl interp, since it adds only perl-base > > > R: to few vim packages, and perl-base is already required by vim-rt. > > > > Enable these IMO. There is vim-static for those people who don't want > > additional deps. > > You don't know what you're talking about. I know what I'm talking.
> vim-static is /bin/vi and the > first thing I do is alias vi=vim because vim-static is just too feature > poor. And tell us what are these so important features that you can't live without them but _not_ so important as you don't want to install more deps to get these? And remember that running vim-static as vi is different from running exactly the same binary as for example vim. > I can live with perl but python/ruby/tcl/etc is just an overkill. perl isn't? > If you really want a huge monster with all bells and whistles just do a > vim-this-package-requires-a-lot subpackage :/ If you have small hdd then use vim-static. > Janek -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
