On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 04:32:54PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote: > > IIRC, octave was perfect before (except for missing ex 19) for me and > Andrew's commit messages for example 21 imply that example was previously > perfect for him. Thus, I believe the octave issue for example 21 has been > recently introduced (with revision 8637). If you look at the first page of > the Octave and C plots the random data are quite different. That seems a > major clue, but there doesn't seem to be anything obvious in > bindings/octave/demos/x21.m that is causing this difference, and I also > don't spot anything obvious in the revision 8637 commit. Andrew, could you > take a look?
I woke up this morning and realised the cause of this. Currently test_octave.sh runs all the tests from a single octave process. I suspect this is the cause since plrandd is now used in 2 examples (17 and 21) and so example 21 will give different results now since the random number generator will already have been called in example 17. I will look at this later. Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
