On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > On Feb 16, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: >> > (a) a racket file is in sexpr syntax only for >> > some specific #lang lines, >> >> Those are the only syntaxes that get the '.ss' suffix, though. > > (Um... "No"? Even a certain language that you should be familiar with > is in extended sexpr syntax.)
Exactly - all of the files that use '.ss' are in sexpr syntax. >> Scribble files, for example, have their own suffix, as do >> JavaScript/Datalog/ACL2/etc. > > In that case they might be broken because of this. (But at least for > datalog I don't think that compiling it is desired.) Broken by what? By keeping the file suffixes the same? -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
