On Feb 16, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > On Feb 16, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > >> > (a) a racket file is in sexpr syntax only for > >> > some specific #lang lines, > >> > >> Those are the only syntaxes that get the '.ss' suffix, though. > > > > (Um... "No"? Even a certain language that you should be familiar > > with is in extended sexpr syntax.) > > Exactly - all of the files that use '.ss' are in sexpr syntax.
I suspect that #{foo : Integers} is not something that many schemers would think of as "sexpr syntax". > >> Scribble files, for example, have their own suffix, as do > >> JavaScript/Datalog/ACL2/etc. > > > > In that case they might be broken because of this. (But at least > > for datalog I don't think that compiling it is desired.) > > Broken by what? By keeping the file suffixes the same? Broken by using their own suffix. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev