On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:53:15PM -0400, David A. Desrosiers wrote: > It would seem that these two options go together. If you set the > owner of the document, crypting the string into the header of the Plucked > document, beaming it to someone else will do you (or them) no good, unless > their device's UserID string exactly matches yours (highly unlikely, unless > you're beaming between two devices of your own, both with the same UserID > set for testing).
Shouldn't they be removed altogether? Preveting copy is encouraging DRM. DRM should be flushed down the toilets. Free software is about sharing knowledge and encouraging copy, IMHO quite far from restricting or preventing copy. -- Guylhem P. Aznar Now *@externe.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>@metalab.unc.edu->@7un.org->@externe.net) http://externe.net/geekcode http://externe.net/photos GPG: 92EB37C1 DD11C9C9 20519D01 E8FA1B11 42975AF7 http://externe.net/pubkey _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
