Plucker-team was set up because plucker-dev bacame subscriber-only (due to spam issues, and evil spamcop in particular), and is now moderated; plucker-team is (and was) neither. The moderation stuff I took on because I thought it would make plucker-dev more approachable, but if the load of messages I have to moderate gets too high then I can always refer people to plucker-team, which is unmoderated.
I think that the plucker-team/plucker-dev distinction is best in terms of keeping the -dev moderation managable and free of spam for the majority of interested people, while still allowing non-subscribers easy access to a few developers who don't mind getting spammed occasionally. (The spam thing became a big issue when my company was blacklisted after a subscriber told spamcop that we were spamming them, when the spam actually came from the list... well, what can ya do). Cheers Mark On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 06:52, Robert O'Connor wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002, Mark Lillywhite wrote: > > > Mail to plucker-dev that seems relevant (development) that's from > > > unsubscribed users, I tend to let through. > > On a somewhat related note, why does the viewer send mail to plucker-team, and not >plucker- > list? > > I thought plucker-team was for team discussions, and most things coming from the >viewer are > questions on how to use something. > > I know the menu item says 'Contact the developers', so plucker-team is the best >address for > that description, but perhaps the menu item could be (or have another menu entry of) >something > like 'Contact users mailing list' > > Best wishes, > Robert > _______________________________________________ > plucker-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev -- Mark Lillywhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Rubber Chicken Consortium _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
