Hi,

> > Mail to plucker-dev that seems relevant (development) that's from
> > unsubscribed users, I tend to let through.
> 
> I thought *all* messages from unsubscribed users were rejected (except
> for messages sent to plucker-team and plucker-bugs). 

Mailman holds mail for posting where ezmlm .. well ezmlm was so
impenetrable that even if a feature existed it was difficult to work out
how to turn it on. So, now, mail from non-subscribers can get through,
if I approve it. At the moment I get about 10 moderations per day, about
3 or 4 of which I let through (most of the rest are spam). So it really
is a subscriber-only list but I am allowing some exceptions; under ezmlm
it was completely automatic.

If you don't think I should let the unsubbed senders through then i will
stop. It's easier for me :). But I thought this struck a nice balance
and made the lists friendlier.

Also I knew that you and some others didn't know that I was doing this,
I've been meaning to post about it for a while but things are crazy here
as usual!!

> 
> > The reason I'm posting this is so that you can make objections to what
> > I'm letting through/not letting through.
> 
> Well, I think all messages where the ratio between new text and quoted
> text doesn't reach a certain limit should be rejected. Of course, I
> think that should apply for subscribed users, too ;-)

Yess.. not much I can do about that :)

> Then we have those folks that include a HTML copy with their text
> message (Mark, you might want to turn off that feature in Evolution:)
> 
> However, the HTML messages don't "annoy" me that much any longer,
> since I filter them already on the mail server and take a look in 
> the multipart/alternative folder now and then to see if it contains
> any "interesting" messages...

I try to remember to turn off HTML mail to the list (I guess I should
set up an address book entry to do that automagically). I don't
personally subscribe to the HTML-in-email-is-bad viewpoint, but I don't
want to be an autocrat so let the flames begin :)  ... or not.

Cheers!
Mark

-- 
Mark Lillywhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to