> -----Message d'origine----- > De: Michael Nordström [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Date: mercredi 2 octobre 2002 17:00 > Ā: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet: Re: owner_id_build vs. copyprevention_bit > > To summarize, using the owner ID protection as a share denial (DRM) > solution will not work (unless the users accept it), since anyone > that can view such a document can easily remove the "protection" > and redistribute an unprotected copy to family and friends.
Except if a modified version of the viewer uses another kind of key : the device's serial number, an s/key one-time-password, etc... AND the modified viewers remains closed (commercial version remaining closed, against the GPL, as was already seen with BlueFish). NH _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
