> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Steeves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: mercredi 27 novembre 2002 18:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Point one solved
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:15, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> > > Is there anything that can be done from a code standpoint to 
> > > increase the speed of plucker-build? Plucking my normal channels 
> > > takes all day(literally 23:50!)
> > 
> >     I have yet to see a channel take longer than 4 minutes 
> on my machine, 
> > and I'm only on a piddly cable modem. Are you talking about 
> Windows? 
> > Or Linux? Or Plucker Desktop?

Win2K, T1 connection
 
> Of course, any channel can take an infinite (well, 
> practically infinite) amount of time if you try to slurp the 
> whole Internet or something silly like that...
> 
> What are these day-long-to-build channels doing, exactly?

Just take the showcase channels like slashdot, palminfoncenter and 2 or 3
others and see by yourself. It will take hours to build.
However, I now have a list that takes a lot less (10 to 15 minutes with 15
channels) that I have taylored myself using spidering properties.

In fact, the problem relies in pre-defined channels.

BTW, sorry for my M$ Outlook clubersome quoting, what I have to use at work
:(
-- 
Florent
_______________________________________________
plucker-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list

Reply via email to