On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:27:20PM -0400, David Schwanke wrote:
[snip]
> I went through 20 or 30 files on each list and didn't find a single
file
> that wasn't someone stealing someone elses intellectually property.
> Music, movies, software, even porn.
> 
> Roughly speaking, I view using bittorent with your site as having to
> wade through a crack house district to get to that really nice book
shop
> that for whatever reason feels its best location is right next door to
a
> crack house.

I've always found this perspective on peer-to-peer technology
fascinating.  You clearly have no such misgivings using the web or
email, both of which are used *extensively* to infringe copyright or
transmit porn.  Why should an application which uses peer-to-peer be
different?  For that matter, how do you justify using a computer at all?



--- me ---
See the msg I just wrote about the difference between p2p and
ftp/http/other standard protocols from the software pirate/porn
distributers perspective.  Ive played both sides of the fence. And made
a substantial amount of money on the illegal side. There is a BIG
difference.  P2p makes it 100 times easier to commit theft then the
internet alone does. 

Whether your deep into software piracy/porn or just a casual user, its
clear to see that it advances THAT industry far more then it does the
legitimate ones no matter how much 'potential' it has. And if you cant
see that (whether or not you agree that it shouldn't be used because of
it) then your just putting your blinders on and not admitting that
that's a crackhouse next door and it might be your kids that visit it.

In the software piracy underground there are degrees of access that you
can gain based on the amount of respect you earn in the community.  The
more you prove yourself and your ability to keep a secret, break the law
without getting caught, and general intelligence the higher you can get.
I ran a US top 10 board.  We transferred easily over a million dollars
worth of stolen software in the time that I ran it give or take a couple
hundred thousand.  

In that time I learned that public internet access is the LEAST usefull
way to transfer stolen software but an unfortunately necessity primarily
because that is the only way the end user has the best ability to
receive it.  90% of the high traffic for software piracy (including
music and video as software) is done through private payed locations.
Usually campus networks because of their unlimited free access to
students and high bandwidth abilities.  

HOWEVER, as each new level of p2p technology has come forward and
increasing amount of that illegal transfer has been shifting from the
private locations into public domain and been done not by 'trained
professionals' (I use the term very loosely hehe) but by the common joe,
and has increased the general access to stolen software several fold.

This really would be a great idea, were it not for the fact that we live
in a messed up world where crime and the internet go hand in hand far
more then crime and real life.




--- you ---
The fact is, bittorrent is a tool.  It happens to be a very useful and
effective tool.  The fact that it can be used to distribute illegal
copies of software or porn does not diminish its usefulness as a
distribution tool.  Similarly, the fact that a personal computer can be
used to digitally copy a DVD and make it available to millions of people
around the globe does not diminish its usefulness as a word processor.

--- me ---
No, it doesn't. But 98% of the user populace of bittorent (according to
the only two lists that bittorrent advertises as places to find files)
is using it illegally as opposed to not nearly that for the general
computer or even general internet connection.




As David pointed out earlier, the technology in bittorrent is exciting
stuff.  It may be that one day soon, your browser will make use of the
same technology, because it is an *efficient way to deliver content*.

---
That may be the case. And ill be more then happy so long as a company
such as Microsoft or Sun or whomever is in charge of it.  They have
something to loose when its used all too often for software piracy and
music/video theft.

Whether you like to admit it or not (you actually haven't said so maybe
this is a mistaken assumption) but Microsoft is the leading single
internet software seller because of IE.  As such if you want 'my
browser' to incorporate it, its going to have to get through Microsoft.
:D 

Until then its just a downloader hack and extra nuisance to your
customers.




_______________________________________________
plucker-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list

Reply via email to