by the way, it seems that no one has mentioned that there is a lot of unlit fiber laying in the ground going unutilized. considering that each fiber can carry anywhere up to 50 gbits/sec, shouldn't those be tasked to handle extra traffic? sure, I know there would have to be some extra equipment (like load balancers, extra nodes and other equipment), but it is doable for a lot less cost than the ISP's would have us believe.
-eric from the central offices of the Technomage Guild, utilities management. On Nov 30, 2017, at 1:12 AM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote: > That makes no sense there is tiny bit it either is or is not. They are > treated as utilities now and it is still failing because like I have said it > is a deeply flawed solution. > > The authors notion that startups will not be able to compete b/c they cannot > afford fast lanes shows a lack of networking understanding. Fast lanes help > manage traffic better which helps everyone. Think of highways with HOV lanes. > They exists to help easy congestion on the road. Networking tools like > traffic shaping, throttle, and policing of traffic act the same way. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 30, 2017, at 12:39 AM, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: >> >> repeal > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
