On Dec 13, 2007 1:14 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I understood one of your previous messages, you made the point that > early-stage application architecture decisions make scaling with > cheaper hardware more feasible. I agreed, and followed up with some > ideas about how one might do this.
Not cheaper hardware, robust solutions that can scale from lightweight DB software to larger solutions at a later time without much if any rewrite. > > If you had ideas other than those, please share. Or don't, it's > Bryan's thread. If he's got what he needs to get going, this can just > die. It sounds like he has quite a bit to chew on idea wise with memcached, performance testing postgres & mysql, and the other ideas peppered through this thread. I apologize if you thought I was "calling you out", just the concept of pulling away from a relational database for long-term storage had to be challenged. --Dan --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
