"Orlando Andico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Practically speaking, the fact that commercial Linux vendors are > distancing themselves from ReiserFS is a practical point. > > Red Hat never supported ReiserFS, and Novell which used to support it, > has de-supported it. > > There are several other choices for the enterprise: XFS, ZFS (which > currently works under FUSE), JFS, and of course ext3. > > If you're running a database you can use OCFS or forget about the > filesystem and use ASM. > > About XFS.. I am not sure how large the community involvement is. > Let's not forget that SGI is in deep doodoo as well. I'd go with ext3, > JFS, or ZFS.
I wouldn't go for ZFS until it's integrated into kernel proper instead of via FUSE). Too much performance concerns to worry about -- and the possibility of the user mode FUSE daemon dying. Not for / at least. Just my PhP 2.00 :D -- JM Ibanez Software Architect Orange & Bronze Software Labs, Ltd. Co. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://software.orangeandbronze.com/ _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
