On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM, alan <a...@clueserver.org> wrote:
>
> Depending on where you live you may be able to get DSL/Fiber with faster
> speeds. I have been told it is possible to get just DSL without land line,
> but I think it depends on the carrier.

I'm using Qwest for two "naked" (or stand-alone, or bare) dsl accounts
-- one in SW and another in Seattle.  If I remember correctly, not
using a land line saves ~50% of the land-line cost, but they still
charge something on top of the base DSL price.  What it amounts to is
$35 flat for the first year, and that bounces up to about $48
(guessing) for the "price for life".  That covers service up to
7.5mbps, if your location supports it.

Every DSL provider I've used since ~2002 has offered DSL without a
phone line, but there is definitely some self-selection going on ;) (I
honestly don't recall if I had to search them out or not).

All-in-all, I'm content with Qwest.  It's fast enough for me, latency
is fine, it's not too expensive, and they aren't Comcast.

--Rogan
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to