On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Orlando Andico wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Raul Ocampo wrote:
> ..
> > Yes, at 128MB performance seems to be much better. I'm just wondering if
> > 192MB will give me better performance.
>
> Yes 192MB will help.
> 128MB is too small. I tried it 2 weeks ago. Dismal performance.
>
> 256MB is the "sweet spot" in my experience. But I put 512MB in my
> workstation and have had no reason to complain (I've been at 512MB for
> almost a year now).

Same here. 512MB.  StarOffice, Mozilla, Opera, and KDE all work happily
together.


_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to