For all the bias - I have noticed overwhelming number of basic distro related
fundamental issues related to:
a) Slackware
b) unusual networking setups - which will keep continue giving
c) ubuntu issues related from ancient installs which went through multiple
distribution and even HW updates - accumulating ancient, no longer appropriate
stuff/crud/libraries/unmaintained application versions

To your note - I keep hearing a lot about some stuff - to the point of not
turning radio/news on in the mornings anymore. I agree that it is an indication
of something being terribly broken. It ain't Ubuntu though!

Tomas

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 06:59 -0700, Ben Koenig wrote:
> Am I the only one who has noticed the overwhelming number of technical
> questions asked by Ubuntu users.
> 
> I understand that Devs and Engineers have their opinions about what
> works and what does not, but there is a sense of "did it actually
> work".
> 
> 1) If you want to know how many people use Ubuntu, count the number of
> people talking about it.
> 2) If you want to know how effective Ubuntu is, count the number of
> problems people have
> 
> Ubuntu is a platform that generates a LOT of bad publicity. People
> start using by recommendation, and as someone who has done tech
> support for ubuntu ends users in an official capacity, I can
> confidently say that it's a shit distro.
> This is one of those discussions that can't occur over email. We need
> to start having these discussions in person and share knowledge in a
> more succinct way. I don't need a CS degree to look at the PLUG list
> and realize that Ubuntu is causing people problems!
> 
> There is also an amount of "data driven" decision making to be made
> here. The sad fact is that there is no data for the rate of Linux
> adoption overall, so Ubuntu steps in to make claims such as this one
> on their website:
> 
> "Leading OS foir PCs, IOT, Servers, and the Cloud" ?
> 
> Really? In what universe is Ubuntu the de facto standard for all
> computing? That claim is a bold-faced lie and its up on their fucking
> website. Right now. You tell me how popular ubuntu "deserves" to be.
> 
> 
> I'm sick of their shit and unlike Canonical, I ACTUALLY believe in
> transparency - So I'm signing this message with my first AND last
> name:
> -Ben Koenig
> 
> 
> P.S. don't need to sign with a PGP key, you can find me in the
> Columbia Tech Center if you want to verify my identity. You know, real
> life with real facts.
> 
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:44 PM Thomas Groman <tgrom.autom...@nuegia.net>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 28 May 2019 14:48:53 -0700
> > Darren Couch <dco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I've gone back and forth with distros for a long time.  Ubuntu works
> > > fine for me - I don't have the rolling release blues like I often got
> > > with Arch, or the ancient tools like I did with Debian or CentOS.
> > > I like deb over rpm based solely on what I got used to.
> > > If I need the bleeding edge of something odds are there is a PPA out
> > > there making it happen.
> > > Started in Ubuntu in the 5.x era.  Running 19.04 at home at the
> > > moment. Anymore I don't like having to spend ages setting up a
> > > development box.  I want mostly stable with the toolchains I need.
> > > Ubuntu fits the bill for me.
> > > 
> > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:02 AM Paul Heinlein <heinl...@madboa.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Mon, 27 May 2019, Tomas Kuchta wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > What is this about? Are you honestly asking question about someone
> > > > > elses opinion? Are you willing to accept the answers? What ever
> > > > > they may be?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Obviously, the answer to your question - what is the best Linux
> > > > > distro - is 42.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 42 - Because it depends on what is the the question and who is
> > > > >      asking it.
> > > > 
> > > > +1
> > > > 
> > > > Draw up your list of requirements, which might include
> > > > 
> > > > * stability
> > > > * support for a certain application
> > > > * bleeding-edge software
> > > > * scalable administration
> > > > * good desktop interface
> > > > * support for specific or niche hardware
> > > > * minimal disk/RAM footprint
> > > > * commercial technical support
> > > > * ease of installation
> > > > * ease of administration
> > > > 
> > > > and then locate a distribution that fits your requirements. I find
> > > > it difficult to believe that after 25 years of Linux distribution
> > > > releases people are still looking for one distribution that will
> > > > check all those boxes (as well as others I didn't list). None is
> > > > perfect; each pursues certain priorities at the expense of others.
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Paul Heinlein
> > > > heinl...@madboa.com
> > > > 45°38' N, 122°6' W_______________________________________________
> > > > PLUG mailing list
> > > > PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> > > > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Why not just run Debian/Devuan Testing?
> > _______________________________________________
> > PLUG mailing list
> > PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to