I was giving feedback that it might resolve itself + I was being smart about it.
Yes, I feel that the discussion is not moving productively anywhere and we are not learning. But .... I am not participating, nor feel offended/upset/etc.... I do not really mind. Tomas On Thu, Jun 3, 2021, 20:32 wes <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this is an ongoing topic and probably doesn't need to be closed. > however you are welcome to use gmail's mute feature if you would like to > stop seeing it. > > the footer was removed last week or so, as a test at tom's request. since > then, I have seen emails from him flagged as spam, and also not flagged. > > decisions to flag or not are based on a scoring system. each indicator of > email legitimacy is given a numerical value, and the scores from each > factor found in a given email are added together. the email service > provider sets a threshold of how high a score has to be to flag the email. > different providers will have different factors they consider, and set > their own threshold. > > using linode to send emails is definitely a problem, even if you don't see > it. > > -wes > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 3:22 PM TomasK <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > FYI > > > > This email has landed in my gmail inbox, not spam - perhaps it is time > > to retire this super long thread - before enough people mark is as spam > > - LOL. > > > > Maybe gmail-machines (yes it is Matrix reference) pays attention to > > human replies and re-classifies ... > > > > Tomas > > > > On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 14:11 -0700, Tom wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Thanks for reaching out to inform us about this blocklisting. We > > > understand and share your concern regarding the recent listing of our > > > ASN with UCEPROTECT's Level 3 service. After researching the details > > > of > > > the listing, we have determined that the Level 3 service offered by > > > UCEPROTECT is not reputable, and we will not be paying for delisting > > > from their service. > > > > > > If you discovered this listing as a result of researching a bounced > > > email, can you please tell us the name of the mail provider which > > > rejected your mail? We have found that customers reaching out > > > regarding > > > this listing are really being rejected by internal RBLs of mail > > > providers, but are reaching out because the UCEPROTECT listing is the > > > only public service where they were able to find their IP address > > > listed. We can usually request delisting with most providers if > > > you're > > > able to provide us the following information: > > > > > > A copy of the 550 bounce code from the mail server > > > The domain name sending mail > > > Confirmation that SPF has been configured for the domain sending > > > mail > > > > > > We understand the importance of email deliverability and how it > > > impacts > > > our customers, which is why all Linode accounts created after > > > November > > > 2019 are incapable of sending any email by default: > > > > > > https://www.linode.com/blog/linode/a-new-policy-to-help-fight-spa > > > m/ > > > > > > Thank you in advance for providing the requested information. We’re > > > happy to work towards getting your Linode’s IP address removed from > > > any > > > blocklists that may be causing deliverability issues for your mail. > > > Please let us know if you have any questions, or if you need anything > > > else. > > >
