On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Nathan England <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can agree with you in the sense that I find it hilarious anyone would > use science to > back up their position. Science is in large part unproven theories, just > as the Bible is > only a book with little physical evidence it is right. > > Regardless, I personally (obviously) have chosen to place my faith in that > book rather > than science false so called. You cannot deny it takes as much faith to > believe a book > as it does science, especially unproven science. > I think you are conflating the definition of theory in the general vernacular vs. the definition used in "Science (tm)". A scientific theory has a lot of evidence supporting it, years or decades of research with repeatable experiments. It's a false dichotomy to equate faith with the "Theory of Relativity". /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
