On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Nathan England <nat...@nmecs.com> wrote: > Obviously, this is a stupid example, but the point is I can craft an > experiment to prove my > children do not exist.
But this is the point of science. Theories without corroboration, peer review, etc is useless. Just like your example is. Your example isn't what's stupid. Your ignorance about the scientific community (testing each others work, re-testing, designing new experiments to disprove your theories) is completely ignoring the most important part of science. But now that I put your inflammatory comments in perspective with your past writings, and taken a moment to let my anger subside, I can clearly see that you are just a Troll. /ignore /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
