When I say Good vs Evil, I am talking New Testament Good vs. Evil. And I would submit to you your source of info comes from a corrupt Gov that has proven itself not to be trustworthy.
We now know our Gov will do whatever it needs to do to get whatever it wants. ------------------------ Keith Smith --- On Tue, 6/25/13, Daniel C. <dcrooks...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Daniel C. <dcrooks...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Defining Terrorism To: "Provo Linux Users Group" <plug@plug.org> Date: Tuesday, June 25, 2013, 12:34 PM On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:23 PM, keith smith <klsmith2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > I think your answer is good vs. evil. If the act is used for evil, then it > is an act of terrorism. I think most people would agree with this. Oh, absolutely. Everyone wants to be on the side of good. Osama bin Laden was so worried about being a good Muslim that he held long, very serious debates with his top advisors about whether the terrorist acts they were planning would violate any tenets of Islam. We know this because some of these discussions were documented on the hard drives we recovered from his compound. So unfortunately I don't think "is what they did good or evil" makes a very useful measuring stick. -Dan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
