PyQt3 was much more Pythonic, and I like PySide even more. And the GUI code generated by Qt Designer was very impressive--easy to read and modify. I have never dealt with such clean generated code with any other tool.
Richard On Friday, January 24, 2014 17:53:53 Michael Torrie wrote: > On 01/24/2014 04:14 PM, Nicholas Leippe wrote: > > I've done QT w/both C++ and python--but only using QT Designer. > > I must say, that QT with python is an amazing combination--even without a > > slick IDE the python bindings make it even easier than with C++. > > I haven't used PyQt for a while (or PySide for that matter). Are the > bindings more pythonic. It used to be they were really just C++ > transliterated into Python. Dave Smith used to say he preferred using > C++ with Qt because in Python he just felt like he was still using C++, > but with Python as the dialect. > > I have used Qt Designer for GUI design (loading the ui file directly > into my app) and it was pretty nice, though Glade-2 or Glade-3 were > about as capable as Qt Designer. > > One of the things I like about Gtk+ in Python is that the bindings feel > quite at home there. Native python data types are used wherever > possible, and the API felt Python native. > > Anyway. <snip> /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
