If only this thread had appeared a month prior to when it originally did. I got a LinkSys WRT1900ACS and will be shipping it back to Amazon this week. It has all these great options supposedly, but then if you want to do anything other than turn it on and let is suck up energy (have dependable wireless, MAC filtering, not randomly reboot) you start running into trouble. I should have checked the forums first, others have similar experiences.
Anyone tried the Archer C3200? On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 04:32:24 PM Eric Olsen wrote: > I currently use the Nighthawk and would definitely +1 it. I haven't tried > the C7, but I've used the C8 and C9 and definitely appreciate them both. > > -Eric > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Jonathan Duncan < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Joel Finlinson <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Chris Wood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Jonathan Duncan > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There are many great options for WiFi routers. They do the job of > > > > > > router > > > > > > > > and access point. > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > - TP-LINK Archer C7 AC1750 ( > > > > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00BUSDVBQ) > > > > > > I also have a TP-Link Archer C8 but I don't use the NAT/routing > > > > functionality on that. I use it as a stand alone WAP. I'm generally > > > > happy with it and installed an Archer C7 at a relatives' home > > > > recently. I believe Xmission recommends the Archer C7 for their > > > > Utopia customers running at their 250 mbps level. > > > > > > +2 on the TP-Link Archer C7. I'm installed two of them in different > > > locations with great success. Great coverage and lots of > > > configurability. > > > > Lots of love for the Archer. Anyone tried the Nighthawk? /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
