pippin wrote: > I wouldnt see ow that should work. > If your audiobooks are not alphabetically sorted, iPeng should not show > an a-z index but a numerical,one (or just dots) that breaks down the > list into chunks of 25 items. > IF the list is alphabetically sorted, how should iPeng know that in this > particular case it should not use the alphabet index but some other > criterion (which is also probably specific to your use case)?
An album title looks like this: "Die ??? - 028 - und der Doppelgänger" I wanted to keep these albums together when browsing all albums. Without the series name in the title, "028 - und der Doppelgänger", the album would end up between different kinds of albums. But maybe I'll change that. pippin wrote: > For its own menus, iPeng does already go to some length to try to find a > better index, like a.g. Skipping initial letters under certain > circumstances. > > But in addition to that.... in many cases the indexes are provided by > LMS which generally knows better how the list is sorted and how the > sorting got created. Ok, I just thought, because iPeng knows all the titles before they are displayed, it could filter out everything before ### (if it's the same for all albums in the list) and then use the numerical index instead. It could check the first x albums and if they are named in the same scheme ([SERIES] ### [something]), check all of them and then use 25 chunks or whatever. But I think I'll just change the album titles. It was just a thought. :) QLMS 7.9.2@2.04 x64 (digimaster) with perl 5.28 dedicated to me. :D / QNAP 469L QTS 4.3.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ dolodobendan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67663 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51929
_______________________________________________ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins