*p.mapper 1* is more tested and will not change any more directory structures, etc. Mainly some modifications of query and attribute search parts are foreseen so far to allow more flexible search (especially with PostGIS layers) and result display.
*p.mapper 2* is regarded as beta. And I'm planning to investigate once also some time in a more flexible file/dir structure with basic libraries, config and customized parts better separated. Also there might be still some issues with the Ajax requests. I haven't got any more the problems with the failing map image update, but I am not sure if that is solved completely. So far I seem to be the only one experiencing this because there were no postings mentioning that. pm 2 has advantages in being more flexible how to include it in other applications (no frames) and use additional DHTML functionality. But the resizing/(re-)positioning part is not really straightforward currently. I don't know when I will investigate some time again in this. And since nobody else seems to want to work on this it might still remain a temporary solution. With regard to 'prototype.js' I will check if the current code of pm 2 is compatible with it, since as I understand prototype.js is not compatible with some type of array handling. pm 1 should not very much affected by prototype because it's using only fairly amounts of DHTML/DOM and the javascript code is not very 'modern'. armin > --- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Alessandro Pasotti <ale.pas at tiscali.it> > An: pmapper-users at faunalia.it > Betreff: [Pmapper-users] which branch for a new project > Datum: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:02:38 +0100 > > Hello, > > After our first public deployment of pmapper (on www.aptversilia.it, very > slow > server indeed) we are starting a new project for an intranet application > which will need a high degree of functional customisation (probably with > sort > of AJAX stuff), what branch would you suggest to use as code base? > > In particular, I cant' remember where I've heard about using protoype js > libs, > this would be a good starting point if they were alreay used in some > pmapper > branch. > > We have been working with 1.0.7 so far. > > > Any hint would be highly appreciated. > > Regards. > -- > Alessandro Pasotti > ICQ# 245871392 > Linux User #167502 > > -- Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer! Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
