On 12/21/2013 10:26 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Since the link has been introduced, isn't it wise to leave pocl.icd > with content > > @libdir@/libpocl.so > > (no .VER)?
Then it doesn't point to the exact installed pocl version. One can have multiple versions of pocl installed (for some reason), and libpocl.so symlink will then point to only one of them. > Or is there something wrong with my environment I haven't figured out? Do you know what is the logic in the dynamic library file name numbering in FreeBSD? I recall we added this sed replacement trick the last time (there's a special check for FreeBSD in that makefile). But why it has now incremented to 4? We can of course fix that easily to 4, but it would be better to know how it (libtool?) determines the library number there to fix it for good. -- --Pekka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ pocl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pocl-devel
