Hello Clayton, hello zyx, hello all, > On 30 October 2018 at 18:34 Clayton Wheeler <cwhee...@genomenon.com> wrote: > ... snip ... > the typo in that comment, but I rewrote it after a closer reading of section > 7.5.5 anyway; it implies the ID can be indirect when a PDF is unencrypted. >
what the patch doesn't do is to insert a check for the document actually being not encrypted. Should that that be added (as an extra commit), what do you think? IHMO yes, because if it were encrypted, an indirect ID would be against the PDF standard, right? I think that should be caught ... > Thanks, > -- > > > Clayton Wheeler > cwhee...@genomenon.com Best regards, mabri _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
