> On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 22:53 +0500, Ivan Romanov via Podofo-users
> wrote:
> > Hi guys. I wrote a patch and opened a ticket on SF. Seems its not
> > actived so I duplicate this too.
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/102/  
> 
>       Hi,
> I'm not sure I'd "approve" such tool. The watermarks have their
> intention/usage, removing them might "break" the intention. I'm not
> the decision maker here, I'm just saying my personal opinion.

Any tool for any changing (not only in PDF) can '"break" the
intention'. If you think that removinh optional contens is always bad
purposes tool. It's not so. In my personal case I dropped the big red
ARCHIVE from every page. But first page contains still contains
warning about current state of document. This ARCHIVE obstructs me to
read document. Often watermarks added to foreign documents. For example
I have washing machine Candy Goy 1050 D. I very old model and I loose
instruction for it. I go to Goole and download instruction on first
link. I get https://i.imgur.com/EBy9voW.png. Here site added own ads to
original document and I want to repair it.


_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to