> On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 22:53 +0500, Ivan Romanov via Podofo-users > wrote: > > Hi guys. I wrote a patch and opened a ticket on SF. Seems its not > > actived so I duplicate this too. > > https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/102/ > > Hi, > I'm not sure I'd "approve" such tool. The watermarks have their > intention/usage, removing them might "break" the intention. I'm not > the decision maker here, I'm just saying my personal opinion.
Any tool for any changing (not only in PDF) can '"break" the intention'. If you think that removinh optional contens is always bad purposes tool. It's not so. In my personal case I dropped the big red ARCHIVE from every page. But first page contains still contains warning about current state of document. This ARCHIVE obstructs me to read document. Often watermarks added to foreign documents. For example I have washing machine Candy Goy 1050 D. I very old model and I loose instruction for it. I go to Goole and download instruction on first link. I get https://i.imgur.com/EBy9voW.png. Here site added own ads to original document and I want to repair it. _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users