> I agree with you, zxy. This is not the purpose of the PoDoFo library > to filter anything from the original PDF file. Suppose you want to > use the library to know whether watermarks are present or not, you > need watermarks as input.
PoDoFo allready has tools which modify pdfs. Take a look to podofocrop for example or podofomerge or anything else. Why some tools is OK but other not OK in such case? > I had to do that in my own program and for me it is part of the > application using the library. > > Regards, > Christophe > > > Le mer. 12 août 2020 à 09:29, zyx <z...@gmx.us> a écrit : > > > On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 22:53 +0500, Ivan Romanov via Podofo-users > > wrote: > > > Hi guys. I wrote a patch and opened a ticket on SF. Seems its not > > > actived so I duplicate this too. > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/102/ > > > > Hi, > > I'm not sure I'd "approve" such tool. The watermarks have their > > intention/usage, removing them might "break" the intention. I'm not > > the decision maker here, I'm just saying my personal opinion. > > Bye, > > zyx _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users