> I agree with you, zxy. This is not the purpose of the PoDoFo library
> to filter anything from the original PDF file. Suppose you want to
> use the library to know whether watermarks are present or not, you
> need watermarks as input.

PoDoFo allready has tools which modify pdfs. Take a look to
podofocrop for example or podofomerge or anything else. Why some tools
is OK but other not OK in such case?

> I had to do that in my own program and for me it is part of the
> application using the library.
> 
> Regards,
> Christophe
> 
> 
> Le mer. 12 août 2020 à 09:29, zyx <z...@gmx.us> a écrit :
> 
> > On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 22:53 +0500, Ivan Romanov via Podofo-users
> > wrote:  
> > > Hi guys. I wrote a patch and opened a ticket on SF. Seems its not
> > > actived so I duplicate this too.
> > > https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/102/  
> >
> >         Hi,
> > I'm not sure I'd "approve" such tool. The watermarks have their
> > intention/usage, removing them might "break" the intention. I'm not
> > the decision maker here, I'm just saying my personal opinion.
> >         Bye,
> >         zyx


_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to