Ah OK, it is in a dedicated tool. So, ignore my previous e-mail.
Regards, Christophe Le jeu. 13 août 2020 à 19:43, Ivan Romanov via Podofo-users < podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net> a écrit : > > I agree with you, zxy. This is not the purpose of the PoDoFo library > > to filter anything from the original PDF file. Suppose you want to > > use the library to know whether watermarks are present or not, you > > need watermarks as input. > > PoDoFo allready has tools which modify pdfs. Take a look to > podofocrop for example or podofomerge or anything else. Why some tools > is OK but other not OK in such case? > > > I had to do that in my own program and for me it is part of the > > application using the library. > > > > Regards, > > Christophe > > > > > > Le mer. 12 août 2020 à 09:29, zyx <z...@gmx.us> a écrit : > > > > > On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 22:53 +0500, Ivan Romanov via Podofo-users > > > wrote: > > > > Hi guys. I wrote a patch and opened a ticket on SF. Seems its not > > > > actived so I duplicate this too. > > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/102/ > > > > > > Hi, > > > I'm not sure I'd "approve" such tool. The watermarks have their > > > intention/usage, removing them might "break" the intention. I'm not > > > the decision maker here, I'm just saying my personal opinion. > > > Bye, > > > zyx > > > _______________________________________________ > Podofo-users mailing list > Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users >
_______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
