On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:22:58PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:18:57 -0400 Rocco Caputo wrote: > +------------------ > | You bring up an interesting question in passing. What should POE's > | components be called? POE::Component, POE::Class, POE::Object? > +------------------ > > The problem that I have with using POE::Component is that it is > occupied. I'd hate to see backward compatibility broken by a new > POE release. It would also be useful if the name were still nmemonic. > Other than that I dont think it matters much.
I'd vote for POE::Object. Because it is an instance. POE::Class would be the class in general. torvald