"Gilbert Jeiziner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the moment, this is not needed. I work in another environment, and i'm
> far than ready to commit anything to pokersource directly...so i won't
> bother until the moment i'm satisfied with my work.
It's ok to use the pokersource SVN for "work in progress". Specially
for something new such as a thread safe C++ wrapper. The worst that can
happen is that I take a look and make usel{ess,full} comments.
> I think real thread-safe implementation most probably requires quite some
> changes in poker-eval itself...again, i'd like to do this and test this in
> my own environement.
C++ namespaces will help a lot in this department.
> I will be basing my work on poker-eval version 134 (as provided in
> ubuntu), but i can't find such a tag in the svn sources. does it exist?
It's not tagged ? Bad. It should. That's the latest version anyways.
The SVN did not change much.
> I also assume that poker-eval module does not go through alot of changes
> now...it's extensive, stable...so even if i take long, there will not be
> many troubles merging my work in (if i get to the point)...it's gonna be
> C++ and will also rely on Qt environment (as i see it now).
There is little risk that you face a massive divergence from the
source.
> Don't expect anything soon...but maybe some day there will be a
> thread-safe poker-eval library.
Sweet :-)
--
+33 1 76 60 72 81 Loic Dachary mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latitude: 48.86962325498033 Longitude: 2.3623046278953552
_______________________________________________
Pokersource-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pokersource-users
