--- Cami Sardinha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And what happens when someone requests a 3rd, 4th and 5th MySQL > backup option?
nobody would need that :) The approach that I suggested would work perfectly for 1+1 redundancy. If someone wants a bigger redundancy solution, it would anyway require some customization of the code (if not a complete redesign). I understand that Mysql dual-master setup is not a rocket science - I'll most probably go that way myself. But the way I suggested would minimize the administrative burden and synchronization efforts. In theory, that could even lead to a self-healing redundant solution... but then it really needs a redesign and refactoring, so that the storage level is separated from the operation logic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ policyd-users mailing list policyd-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/policyd-users
