> I think that the one in violation of the specs is the server in this > case.
Right, thinko. But that's not the issue I'm worried about. If the client says "Connection: Upgrade", we correctly discard the Upgrade. On the other hand, if the client says just "Upgrade: foo" with no suitable "Connection" header, we'll tunnel the Upgrade request, which is not correct since we cannot handle the upgraded protocol. In that case, we'll err-out when we receive the 101 answer. But perhaps we should preemptively drop the Upgrade header in any case? I guess I'll leave it as it is, until somebody reports an issue. -- Juliusz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Polipo-users mailing list Polipo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/polipo-users
