http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Re0vmbtHK8&feature=related

This is a shocking video about the AIP, to which Sarah Palin is
closely affiliated.  She spoke to their 2008 convention, and attended
the 1994 convenetion.  Her husband was a member for years,  According
to the speaker, so was Sarah Palin. More shocking, he indicates that
she joined the GOP to further her political goals, but her agenda was
still basically the AIP's agenda..

Here's a quote from AIP's founder that will set the stage for this
video:

“The fires of Hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the
American government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag!”

--- Alaskan Independence Party founder Joe Voegler


In the video, the man speaking (with the beard) is Vice Chairman of
the AIP, Dexter Clark

This is a partial transcript, but you should really listen to it
yourself to get the full impact.

(BEGIN QUOTE)
...The basic argument of the Alaskan Independence Party has always
been the number one plank in our platform - the question of our vote
to become a state. So…the most blaring disparity in that vote was the
definition of an eligible voter.  Among those qualified to cast a
ballot were 41,000 American soldiers and 36,000 dependants.  Now, to
the native population of Alaska, to me, these were occupation troops!
And they were made eligible and, in fact encouraged to vote. There
were educational meetings held on the military bases.  I can’t imagine
them telling anyone that anything but that statehood would be very
good for the military - in fact they still have 6, 7 big bases and
numerous smaller holdings in the state.  Statehood would be good for
the military.  Now can you imagine the international uproar if
American troops had all went and got their purple fingers in
Iraq? ...':
(END OF QUOTE)

WOAH!  The AIP considers American soldiers in Alaska to be "occupation
troops"?  He objects to the soldiers being able to vote!  He equates
American soldiers stationed at American bases in Alaska (Americans and
Alaska is part of the U.S.) voting with the scenario of American
troops voting in Iraq!  This is so wrong on so many levels, it makes
me nauseous.

Okay, after he calls American soldiers "occupying troops and equates
them voting in Alaska with the scenario of them voting in Iraq, he
continues with obections to the way statehood was voted-in in Alaska.
Not only that, he objects to voters being required to read and write
English, which was a requirement of the Voters Right Act at that
time.

Thats right: he objects to voters being required to read and write
English!

At about minute 6:00, he discusses how the AIP supported Sarah Palin
as governor.  AND he says, before she ran for mayor, she was an AIP
member.  This is the kicker: he indicates that she joined the
Republican Party to advance her political career.  He also indicates
thatthe Republican Party was "pretty well sympathetic" to former AIP
membership.  Basically, he's saying "Sarah Palin may be a registered
GOP but she really --wink, wink--supports the AIP and its agenda.

Pardon the hell out of me, but the "pretty well sympathetic" comment
is very worrisome.  The Republican Party should have kicked her to the
curb if they thought she was sympathetic with the AIP's agenda!  The
AIP is anti-American, views American soldiers stationed in Alaska as
"occupying troops," and, in fact, has stated he hates America.

(BEGIN QUOTE)...“Our current governor, we mentioned at the last
conference, the one we were hoping would get elected, Sarah Palin, did
get elected. There’s a joke, she’s a pretty good looking gal, there’s
a joke goes around we’re the coldest state with the hottest governor.
(laughter) And there was a lot of talk about her moving up. She was an
AIP member before she got the job as a mayor of a small town — that
was a non-partisan job. But to get along and go along — she eventually
joined the Republican Party, where she had all kinds of problems with
their ethics, and well, I won’t go into that. She also had about an
80% approval rating, and is pretty well sympathetic to her former
membership.“...(END OF QUOTE)

Clark then continues on, discussing the oil industry and how Alaskans
are not profiting enough from it (one of Sarah Palin's beliefs), and
discusses the ethics investigations of GOP Senator Ted Stevens and GOP
congressional rep Don Young.

He then goes on to encourage Alaska-independence, Anti-American groups
to INFILTRATE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY...groups like "Christian Exodus,"
an extremist religious group. He goes on to say that even getting a
member of a group elected to CITY COUNCIL can advance the Anti-
American AIP agenda.  You mean, like Sarah Palin was elected onto the
City Council?  He instructs the listener that anyone can check a box
to join the GOP, even though their agenda and goals are counter-
productive to the GOP's own agenda and goals.

(BEGIN QUOTE)...If there is ever a time that is right for change, this
is it.  In our own situation, we discussed several options.  Do we try
and get our case into the International Court of Justice, or to the
World Court?  Several Native Alaskan organizations are taking that
route, independent of us.  They want to do it on their own terms.
They haven’t realized, in my mind, the potential of their own
political party.  The pitfalls of an organized political party - you
don’t have any control over who joins that party.   They put the X
next to it on the registration form, and if they join the — go into
the primary, and win that primary, they’re your candidate, like it or
not.  I think Ron Paul has kind of proven that.  He’s a dyed -in-the-
wool Libertarian.  He came to Alaska and spoke as a Libertarian.  And
he put the Republican label on to get elected.  That’s all there is to
it.  And any one of your organizations should be using that same
tactic to infiltrate.  I know that Christian Exodus is in favor of it,
I know that the Free State Movement is in favor of it.  I don’t know
that they even care which party it is.  Which ever party you see
where you can get something done, get into that political party, even
though it does have it’s problems.  Right now that is one of the only
avenues.  If you can get a few people on the city council, or a town
board, you can have some effect....(END OF QUOTE)


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to