So this is what Loony Liberal desperation looks like...
On Sep 8, 7:42 am, PoliticalAmazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Re0vmbtHK8&feature=related > > This is a shocking video about the AIP, to which Sarah Palin is > closely affiliated. She spoke to their 2008 convention, and attended > the 1994 convenetion. Her husband was a member for years, According > to the speaker, so was Sarah Palin. More shocking, he indicates that > she joined the GOP to further her political goals, but her agenda was > still basically the AIP's agenda.. > > Here's a quote from AIP's founder that will set the stage for this > video: > > “The fires of Hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the > American government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag!” > > --- Alaskan Independence Party founder Joe Voegler > > In the video, the man speaking (with the beard) is Vice Chairman of > the AIP, Dexter Clark > > This is a partial transcript, but you should really listen to it > yourself to get the full impact. > > (BEGIN QUOTE) > ...The basic argument of the Alaskan Independence Party has always > been the number one plank in our platform - the question of our vote > to become a state. So…the most blaring disparity in that vote was the > definition of an eligible voter. Among those qualified to cast a > ballot were 41,000 American soldiers and 36,000 dependants. Now, to > the native population of Alaska, to me, these were occupation troops! > And they were made eligible and, in fact encouraged to vote. There > were educational meetings held on the military bases. I can’t imagine > them telling anyone that anything but that statehood would be very > good for the military - in fact they still have 6, 7 big bases and > numerous smaller holdings in the state. Statehood would be good for > the military. Now can you imagine the international uproar if > American troops had all went and got their purple fingers in > Iraq? ...': > (END OF QUOTE) > > WOAH! The AIP considers American soldiers in Alaska to be "occupation > troops"? He objects to the soldiers being able to vote! He equates > American soldiers stationed at American bases in Alaska (Americans and > Alaska is part of the U.S.) voting with the scenario of American > troops voting in Iraq! This is so wrong on so many levels, it makes > me nauseous. > > Okay, after he calls American soldiers "occupying troops and equates > them voting in Alaska with the scenario of them voting in Iraq, he > continues with obections to the way statehood was voted-in in Alaska. > Not only that, he objects to voters being required to read and write > English, which was a requirement of the Voters Right Act at that > time. > > Thats right: he objects to voters being required to read and write > English! > > At about minute 6:00, he discusses how the AIP supported Sarah Palin > as governor. AND he says, before she ran for mayor, she was an AIP > member. This is the kicker: he indicates that she joined the > Republican Party to advance her political career. He also indicates > thatthe Republican Party was "pretty well sympathetic" to former AIP > membership. Basically, he's saying "Sarah Palin may be a registered > GOP but she really --wink, wink--supports the AIP and its agenda. > > Pardon the hell out of me, but the "pretty well sympathetic" comment > is very worrisome. The Republican Party should have kicked her to the > curb if they thought she was sympathetic with the AIP's agenda! The > AIP is anti-American, views American soldiers stationed in Alaska as > "occupying troops," and, in fact, has stated he hates America. > > (BEGIN QUOTE)...“Our current governor, we mentioned at the last > conference, the one we were hoping would get elected, Sarah Palin, did > get elected. There’s a joke, she’s a pretty good looking gal, there’s > a joke goes around we’re the coldest state with the hottest governor. > (laughter) And there was a lot of talk about her moving up. She was an > AIP member before she got the job as a mayor of a small town — that > was a non-partisan job. But to get along and go along — she eventually > joined the Republican Party, where she had all kinds of problems with > their ethics, and well, I won’t go into that. She also had about an > 80% approval rating, and is pretty well sympathetic to her former > membership.“...(END OF QUOTE) > > Clark then continues on, discussing the oil industry and how Alaskans > are not profiting enough from it (one of Sarah Palin's beliefs), and > discusses the ethics investigations of GOP Senator Ted Stevens and GOP > congressional rep Don Young. > > He then goes on to encourage Alaska-independence, Anti-American groups > to INFILTRATE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY...groups like "Christian Exodus," > an extremist religious group. He goes on to say that even getting a > member of a group elected to CITY COUNCIL can advance the Anti- > American AIP agenda. You mean, like Sarah Palin was elected onto the > City Council? He instructs the listener that anyone can check a box > to join the GOP, even though their agenda and goals are counter- > productive to the GOP's own agenda and goals. > > (BEGIN QUOTE)...If there is ever a time that is right for change, this > is it. In our own situation, we discussed several options. Do we try > and get our case into the International Court of Justice, or to the > World Court? Several Native Alaskan organizations are taking that > route, independent of us. They want to do it on their own terms. > They haven’t realized, in my mind, the potential of their own > political party. The pitfalls of an organized political party - you > don’t have any control over who joins that party. They put the X > next to it on the registration form, and if they join the — go into > the primary, and win that primary, they’re your candidate, like it or > not. I think Ron Paul has kind of proven that. He’s a dyed -in-the- > wool Libertarian. He came to Alaska and spoke as a Libertarian. And > he put the Republican label on to get elected. That’s all there is to > it. And any one of your organizations should be using that same > tactic to infiltrate. I know that Christian Exodus is in favor of it, > I know that the Free State Movement is in favor of it. I don’t know > that they even care which party it is. Which ever party you see > where you can get something done, get into that political party, even > though it does have it’s problems. Right now that is one of the only > avenues. If you can get a few people on the city council, or a town > board, you can have some effect....(END OF QUOTE) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
