Days after the collapse of the Minneapolis bridge, McCain specifically
linked the collapse to the funding of Sarah Palin's bridge-to-nowhere-
then-lobbyists pork-barrel gluttony.

-----------
“Maybe if we had done it right, maybe some of that money would have
gone to inspect those bridges and other bridges around the country,”
McCain said at a campaign stop in Ankeny, Iowa on Aug. 4, 2007. “Maybe
the 200,000 people who cross that bridge every day would have been
safer than spending $233 million of your tax dollars on a bridge in
Alaska to an island with 50 people on it.”
----------

(BEGIN QUOTE)
http://www.minnesotaindependent.com/8052/mccain-connected-35w-bridge-collapse-to-palins-pork

Over 37 million people saw Sarah Palin declare in her acceptance
speech that she told Congress, “thanks but no thanks on that bridge to
nowhere.” That statement is demonstrably false, but the campaign of
Sen. John McCain continues to tout Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s
opposition to the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere” despite once linking
it to the collapse of the 35W bridge.

During the 2006 gubernatorial campaign, Palin was a strong proponent
of the project, which aimed to connect the town of Ketchikan, Alaska,
to a nearby airport on Gravina Island.

“I support these infrastructure projects,” Palin said during a
gubernatorial debate. “It will build Alaska, and it’s cheaper to do it
today than it is tomorrow.”

Once governor, Palin killed the effort only after it became apparent
that the federal government wasn’t going to put any more money into
the bloated project beyond the $233 million in earmarks that Rep. Don
Young, R-Alaska, had already secured. Under pressure to cut wasteful
spending, Congress then stripped the stipulation that the money be
spent on a bridge but allowed the state of Alaska to keep the $233
million for other transportation projects. Palin then directed her
transportation commissioner, Leo von Scheben, to review transportation
projects statewide to prepare a list of possible uses for the funds.

Days after the 35W bridge collapse John McCain connected that $233
million with the tragedy that claimed 13 lives in Minneapolis.

“Maybe if we had done it right, maybe some of that money would have
gone to inspect those bridges and other bridges around the country,”
McCain said at a campaign stop in Ankeny, Iowa on Aug. 4, 2007. “Maybe
the 200,000 people who cross that bridge every day would have been
safer than spending $233 million of your tax dollars on a bridge in
Alaska to an island with 50 people on it.”

One month after McCain’s critical comments Palin changed her position
on the bridge, citing the project’s high cost to Alaskans, while
continuing to defend the project.

“Despite the work of our congressional delegation, we are about $329
million short of full funding for the bridge project, and it’s clear
that Congress has little interest in spending any more money on a
bridge between Ketchikan and Gravina Island,” Palin stated in a
released statement dated Sept. 21, 2007. “Much of the public’s
attitude toward Alaska bridges is based on inaccurate portrayals of
the projects here. But we need to focus on what we can do, rather than
fight over what has happened.”...(END OF QUOTE)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to