True, but Sarah Palin has sent her into such an ugly tizzy.  LOL The tripe 
she spews is laughable.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PoliticalForum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: MCCAIN LINKS PALIN's PORK-BARREL GLUTTONY TO COLLAPSE OF 
MINNEAPOLIS BRIDGE



pa drinks the koolaid, and posts the crap the dnc emails her to post.
just like murky mikey.  mindless drones

On Sep 9, 3:49 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I doubt it.
>
> For a "Political Amazon", she sure doesn't seem to know all that much
> about Politics.
>
> Looks like she gets most of her Political information from the
> Enquirer and the like...
>
> :-)
>
> On Sep 9, 12:47 pm, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does that moron know that only members of Congress can vote earmarks and 
> > NOT governors?
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "PoliticalForum" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: MCCAIN LINKS PALIN's PORK-BARREL GLUTTONY TO COLLAPSE OF 
> > MINNEAPOLIS BRIDGE
>
> > And Barack Obama Voted FOR the Bridge.
>
> > You going to chastize him, and ask him to send flowers?
>
> > I didn't think so.
>
> > Hypocrite.
>
> > On Sep 9, 12:42 pm, PoliticalAmazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is what McCain blame on Palin's gluttinous porking.
>
> > >http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/070802/070802_co...
>
> > > ------------------
>
> > > On Sep 9, 10:00 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > And Barack Obama Voted FOR the Bridge...
>
> > > > Sarah Palin didn't have a Vote.
>
> > > > On Sep 9, 9:58 am, PoliticalAmazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > Days after the collapse of the Minneapolis bridge, McCain 
> > > > > specifically
> > > > > linked the collapse to the funding of Sarah Palin's 
> > > > > bridge-to-nowhere-
> > > > > then-lobbyists pork-barrel gluttony.
>
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > “Maybe if we had done it right, maybe some of that money would 
> > > > > have
> > > > > gone to inspect those bridges and other bridges around the 
> > > > > country,”
> > > > > McCain said at a campaign stop in Ankeny, Iowa on Aug. 4, 2007. 
> > > > > “Maybe
> > > > > the 200,000 people who cross that bridge every day would have been
> > > > > safer than spending $233 million of your tax dollars on a bridge 
> > > > > in
> > > > > Alaska to an island with 50 people on it.”
> > > > > ----------
>
> > > > > (BEGIN 
> > > > > QUOTE)http://www.minnesotaindependent.com/8052/mccain-connected-35w-bridge-...
>
> > > > > Over 37 million people saw Sarah Palin declare in her acceptance
> > > > > speech that she told Congress, “thanks but no thanks on that 
> > > > > bridge to
> > > > > nowhere.” That statement is demonstrably false, but the campaign 
> > > > > of
> > > > > Sen. John McCain continues to tout Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s
> > > > > opposition to the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere” despite once 
> > > > > linking
> > > > > it to the collapse of the 35W bridge.
>
> > > > > During the 2006 gubernatorial campaign, Palin was a strong 
> > > > > proponent
> > > > > of the project, which aimed to connect the town of Ketchikan, 
> > > > > Alaska,
> > > > > to a nearby airport on Gravina Island.
>
> > > > > “I support these infrastructure projects,” Palin said during a
> > > > > gubernatorial debate. “It will build Alaska, and it’s cheaper to 
> > > > > do it
> > > > > today than it is tomorrow.”
>
> > > > > Once governor, Palin killed the effort only after it became 
> > > > > apparent
> > > > > that the federal government wasn’t going to put any more money 
> > > > > into
> > > > > the bloated project beyond the $233 million in earmarks that Rep. 
> > > > > Don
> > > > > Young, R-Alaska, had already secured. Under pressure to cut 
> > > > > wasteful
> > > > > spending, Congress then stripped the stipulation that the money be
> > > > > spent on a bridge but allowed the state of Alaska to keep the $233
> > > > > million for other transportation projects. Palin then directed her
> > > > > transportation commissioner, Leo von Scheben, to review 
> > > > > transportation
> > > > > projects statewide to prepare a list of possible uses for the 
> > > > > funds.
>
> > > > > Days after the 35W bridge collapse John McCain connected that $233
> > > > > million with the tragedy that claimed 13 lives in Minneapolis.
>
> > > > > “Maybe if we had done it right, maybe some of that money would 
> > > > > have
> > > > > gone to inspect those bridges and other bridges around the 
> > > > > country,”
> > > > > McCain said at a campaign stop in Ankeny, Iowa on Aug. 4, 2007. 
> > > > > “Maybe
> > > > > the 200,000 people who cross that bridge every day would have been
> > > > > safer than spending $233 million of your tax dollars on a bridge 
> > > > > in
> > > > > Alaska to an island with 50 people on it.”
>
> > > > > One month after McCain’s critical comments Palin changed her 
> > > > > position
> > > > > on the bridge, citing the project’s high cost to Alaskans, while
> > > > > continuing to defend the project.
>
> > > > > “Despite the work of our congressional delegation, we are about 
> > > > > $329
> > > > > million short of full funding for the bridge project, and it’s 
> > > > > clear
> > > > > that Congress has little interest in spending any more money on a
> > > > > bridge between Ketchikan and Gravina Island,” Palin stated in a
> > > > > released statement dated Sept. 21, 2007. “Much of the public’s
> > > > > attitude toward Alaska bridges is based on inaccurate portrayals 
> > > > > of
> > > > > the projects here. But we need to focus on what we can do, rather 
> > > > > than
> > > > > fight over what has happened.”...(END OF QUOTE)- Hide quoted 
> > > > > text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >  ATT211172.gif
> > 49KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to