Passion not reason equal Palin Democratic attack dog tactics bend on the politics of personal destruction... PA and her ilk are the new McCarthy witch hunters spreading fear and hatred...
On Sep 11, 1:28 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Passion not reason equals the 'Terri Schiavo' laws! > > On Sep 11, 12:46 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Spin baby spin... Soft stances = more of the same.... Reformers on > > the whole bring strong stands on key issues as it is that passion > > which drive them... > > > On Sep 11, 12:34 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > LMAO, you have a problem with the fact that Obama has > > > stances not made in concrete like Bush? > > > > That Obama allows room for compromise and his positions > > > are in the middle of the road, NOT as you say on the fence. > > > > That is the problem with the GOP, you are either with them > > > or against them and if you are against them then you are the enemy. > > > Absolute positions that allow for only confrontation. > > > > Maybe you haven't noticed, this policy hasn't worked for the last > > > 8 years? > > > > On Sep 11, 12:21 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > One line attack response do not address the major flip-flops or the > > > > major "sitting on the fence positions" by Obama... Specifically on > > > > guns... > > > > > Pretending Obama to be a strong leader with clear positions is > > > > folly... And that is the problem, Obama wants to be seen as a strong > > > > leader WITHOUT taking strong position pro or against... This is in > > > > part why Obama has refuse up to now to point to his "experience" in > > > > education reform from 1995-2000 in the CAC... > > > > > Then he worked with Bill Ayers and others to recentralize the power of > > > > the school board in Chicago after the decentralization of power in the > > > > 70's and 80's (which were "reforms" put in place by the LW of the > > > > Democratic party)... The CAC efforts were not very sucessful (some > > > > call them failures)... > > > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/06/AR200... > > > > > >>> That leaves Obama unrevealed on the D.C. law. In response to my > > > > >>> inquiry about his specific position, Obama's campaign e-mailed me a > > > > >>> one-paragraph answer: Obama believes that while the "Second > > > > >>> Amendment creates an individual right, . . . he also believes that > > > > >>> the Constitution permits federal, state and local government to > > > > >>> adopt reasonable and common sense gun safety measures." Though the > > > > >>> paragraph is titled "Obama on the D.C. Court case," that specific > > > > >>> gun ban is never mentioned. I tried again last week, without > > > > >>> success, to learn Obama's position before writing this column. > > > > > Obama's dance on gun rights is part of his evolution from the radical > > > > young Illinois state legislator he once was. He was recorded in a 1996 > > > > questionnaire as advocating a ban on the manufacture, sale and > > > > possession of handguns (a position he has since disavowed). He was on > > > > the board of the Chicago-based Joyce Foundation, which takes an > > > > aggressive gun control position, and in 2000 considered becoming its > > > > full-time president. In 2006, he voted with an 84 to 16 majority (and > > > > against Clinton) to prohibit confiscation of firearms during an > > > > emergency, but that is his only pro-gun vote in Springfield or > > > > Washington. The National Rifle Association grades his voting record > > > > (and Clinton's) an "F." > > > > > There is no anti-gun litmus test for Democrats. In 2006, Ted > > > > Strickland was elected governor of Ohio and Bob Casey U.S. senator > > > > from Pennsylvania with NRA grades of "A." Following their model, Obama > > > > talks about the rights of "Americans to protect their families." He > > > > has not yet stated whether that right should exist in Washington. > > > > > On Sep 11, 11:54 am, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I know you are stupid. > > > > > > Obama has stated he is against illegal > > > > > handguns or hand guns in the possession > > > > > of criminals. Law abiding citizens can keep > > > > > their guns. > > > > > > WHY do you list these dumb opinion pieces? > > > > > > On Sep 11, 11:38 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/words_obama_will_re...text > > > > > > - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
