I think we are more concerned with how the Chemicals themselves can be
used, and not the Shell, since the Chemicals are the "Killer"...

And yes, Binary Sarin is good for a LONG time...


On Sep 11, 8:56 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaar,
>
> Good boy. Now answer the question as to their condition and the
> condition of the appropiate delivery systems.
>
> On Sep 11, 10:01 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > 500 of the type that were supposed to have been DESTROYED or NEVER
> > MADE!!!!
>
> > They were Sarin and Mustard Gas, they didn't give the break down as to
> > how many of each type...
>
> > On Sep 11, 7:59 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Gaar,
>
> > > 500 shells of specifically what type, in what sort of condition and in
> > > what sort of condition were the appropiate delivery systems of said
> > > shells?
>
> > > I don't NEED to try to "keep up",  I have you to do it for me.
>
> > > On Sep 11, 8:07 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I believe one of the last Reports I saw said something like 500 Shells
> > > > were found...
>
> > > > Again, try to keep up.
>
> > > > On Sep 11, 5:50 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Gaar,
>
> > > > > OH MY GOD, they had TWO??????  :-)
>
> > > > > On Sep 11, 6:11 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Nope, they discovered some with Mustard Gas as well...
>
> > > > > > Try to keep up holly.
>
> > > > > > On Sep 11, 2:41 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Gaar,
>
> > > > > > > A (as in one) 155mm shell containing Sarin gas?????
>
> > > > > > > On Sep 11, 1:43 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/mariani/2004/mariani052804.htm
>
> > > > > > > > The Sound of Silence: Iraq's WMDs Found
>
> > > > > > > > May 28, 2004
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­­­­­­­­-----
> > > > > > > > by Joe Mariani
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­­­­­­­­-----
>
> > > > > > > > After spending more than a year attacking the Bush 
> > > > > > > > administration
> > > > > > > > daily for their supposed failure to produce the WMDs that 
> > > > > > > > everyone --
> > > > > > > > including the United Nations, as well as most leading Democrats 
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > believed Saddam had hidden, the Left has suddenly gone strangely
> > > > > > > > silent on the subject. The "mainstream" media has been tiptoeing
> > > > > > > > around the discovery of a 155-mm mortar shell containing Sarin 
> > > > > > > > gas in
> > > > > > > > Iraq, the contents of which have been confirmed. The shell was 
> > > > > > > > used as
> > > > > > > > part of an improvised explosive device (IED) on a road near the
> > > > > > > > Baghdad International Airport, and exploded as it was being 
> > > > > > > > disarmed.
>
> > > > > > > > The shell contained three liters of Sarin -- nearly a gallon. 
> > > > > > > > It was a
> > > > > > > > type of shell designed to mix chemical components during 
> > > > > > > > flight, which
> > > > > > > > was why the explosion didn't kill anyone (though two soldiers 
> > > > > > > > were
> > > > > > > > treated for exposure). Three liters of Sarin is enough, if the
> > > > > > > > components are mixed properly, to realistically kill hundreds, 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > potentially thousands. A concentration of 100 milligrams of 
> > > > > > > > Sarin per
> > > > > > > > cubic meter of air is enough to constitute a lethal dose for 
> > > > > > > > half the
> > > > > > > > people breathing it within one minute.
>
> > > > > > > > This type of chemical warfare shell had never been declared by 
> > > > > > > > Iraq --
> > > > > > > > it was not even known that Iraq had ever made them. The 1999 
> > > > > > > > UNSCOM
> > > > > > > > report on Iraq reported that thirty binary/Sarin shells were 
> > > > > > > > known to
> > > > > > > > exist, and stated that all had been accounted for. According to
> > > > > > > > UNSCOM, "Iraq developed a crude type of binary munition, 
> > > > > > > > whereby the
> > > > > > > > final mixing of the two precursors to the agent was done inside 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > munition just before delivery." Someone actually had to 
> > > > > > > > physically
> > > > > > > > pour the components of the Sarin (or other type of G-series 
> > > > > > > > nerve
> > > > > > > > agent) into the shells before they could be fired. At least, 
> > > > > > > > that's
> > > > > > > > how the ones we knew about worked.
>
> > > > > > > > So, a previously-unknown type of artillery shell is found in 
> > > > > > > > Iraq,
> > > > > > > > containing an actual, verifiable chemical weapon. This is front 
> > > > > > > > page
> > > > > > > > news, right? Should we expect apologies from formerly doubting
> > > > > > > > Liberals? Newspapers filled with retractions from prominent 
> > > > > > > > Democrats?
> > > > > > > > Conciliatory visits to President Bush from Jaques Chirac and 
> > > > > > > > Gerhardt
> > > > > > > > Schroeder? Not so fast. Remember: it's an election year. 
> > > > > > > > Liberals,
> > > > > > > > Democrats, terrorists and appeasers all want President Bush to 
> > > > > > > > lose
> > > > > > > > the election so everyone can get back to business as usual. 
> > > > > > > > Terrorists
> > > > > > > > want to get back to their implacable war against Western 
> > > > > > > > civilisation,
> > > > > > > > and the others want to get back to trying to placate them. The 
> > > > > > > > media,
> > > > > > > > as long as we let them get away with it, will only run stories 
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > attack President Bush and undermine support for him. In fact, 
> > > > > > > > Liberals
> > > > > > > > already have their spin on this Sarin find ready to go. The vast
> > > > > > > > majority of them -- when you can get them to admit that the 
> > > > > > > > Sarin and
> > > > > > > > the shell are real -- argue that it doesn't matter for one of 
> > > > > > > > four
> > > > > > > > "reasons."
>
> > > > > > > > A. The shell is old, from before the 1991 Gulf War, so it's not 
> > > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > we were looking for.
>
> > > > > > > > Since the cease-fire that suspended the Gulf War depended on 
> > > > > > > > Saddam's
> > > > > > > > handing over to the UN "[a]ll chemical and biological weapons 
> > > > > > > > and all
> > > > > > > > stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and 
> > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > research, development, support and manufacturing facilities", 
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > shell is precisely what we were looking for, especially if it 
> > > > > > > > predates
> > > > > > > > 1991. This shell and others like it is why the UN passed 17
> > > > > > > > resolutions demanding that Saddam disarm. No matter how old it 
> > > > > > > > was, it
> > > > > > > > was still lethal. There is no statute of limitations on weapons 
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > mass destruction.
>
> > > > > > > > B. There is only one shell, not a stockpile, so it doesn't mean
> > > > > > > > anything.
>
> > > > > > > > This one shell contained enough WMD material to potentially 
> > > > > > > > kill as
> > > > > > > > many people as died on 9/11, all by itself. Is it logical to 
> > > > > > > > assume
> > > > > > > > that this is the only one in existence -- or just wishful 
> > > > > > > > thinking?
> > > > > > > > The fact is that we still don't know how much Sarin Iraq 
> > > > > > > > actually
> > > > > > > > produced. "At first, Iraq told UNSCOM that it had produced an
> > > > > > > > estimated 250 tons of tabun and 812 tons of sarin. In 1995, Iraq
> > > > > > > > changed its estimates and reported it had produced only 210 
> > > > > > > > tons of
> > > > > > > > tabun and 790 tons of sarin." (Yes, that's tons.) At the very 
> > > > > > > > least,
> > > > > > > > it tells us that we haven't nearly finished looking for the 
> > > > > > > > WMDs that
> > > > > > > > Saddam was supposed to surrender, and didn't. Besides... a shell
> > > > > > > > containing mustard gas was also found. Well, maybe there were 
> > > > > > > > only two
> > > > > > > > WMD shells in all of Iraq.
>
> > > > > > > > C. Just because Saddam had WMDs after all, it doesn't mean Bush 
> > > > > > > > didn't
> > > > > > > > lie about them.
>
> > > > > > > > As ridiculous as it sounds, this appears to be the instinctive,
> > > > > > > > defensive reaction of many Liberals to this news. They so badly 
> > > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > to believe that President Bush lied in order to legitimise their
> > > > > > > > hatred of him that they're capable of this sort of twisted 
> > > > > > > > reasoning.
> > > > > > > > The rationale seems to be that WMDs don't count if they aren't 
> > > > > > > > exactly
> > > > > > > > where the CIA told us they were, as if they couldn't be moved.
>
> > > > > > > > D. The terrorists didn't even know it was a chemical shell.
>
> > > > > > > > Well, they do now. And they know where they found it, too.
>
> > > > > > > > We need to redouble our efforts to stop the terrorists and find
> > > > > > > > Saddam's WMDs, before they're used to derail the new Iraqi
> > > > > > > > government's formation. The media's refusal to give this news 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > coverage it deserves can only be due to a calculated attempt to 
> > > > > > > > reduce
> > > > > > > > American support for our efforts in Iraq, including that of 
> > > > > > > > tracking
> > > > > > > > down Saddam's banned weapons. The Left's deliberate silence on 
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > subject for the purpose of influencing our election only helps 
> > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > enemies.
>
> > > > > > > > Joe Mariani
>
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­­­­­­­­-----
> > > > > > > > Joe Mariani is a computer consultant born and raised in New 
> > > > > > > > Jersey. He
> > > > > > > > lives in Pennsylvania, where the gun laws are less restrictive 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > taxes are lower. Joe always thought of himself as politically 
> > > > > > > > neutral
> > > > > > > > until he saw how far left the left had really gone after 9/11. 
> > > > > > > > His
> > > > > > > > essays and links to articles are available 
> > > > > > > > athttp://guardian.blogdrive.com/.
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­­­­­­­­------
> > > > > > > >  Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to