Gaar, The Japanese actually HAD casualities.
On Sep 11, 11:45 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no holly... > > It is my way of saying there can be MANY "delivery systems" for Binary > Sarin. > > Just ask the people in Japan. > > On Sep 11, 9:41 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > gaar, > > > It's that your rather coy way of saying they had no reliable, > > serviceable and/or appropiate delivery systems? > > > On Sep 11, 11:29 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think we are more concerned with how the Chemicals themselves can be > > > used, and not the Shell, since the Chemicals are the "Killer"... > > > > And yes, Binary Sarin is good for a LONG time... > > > > On Sep 11, 8:56 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > Good boy. Now answer the question as to their condition and the > > > > condition of the appropiate delivery systems. > > > > > On Sep 11, 10:01 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > 500 of the type that were supposed to have been DESTROYED or NEVER > > > > > MADE!!!! > > > > > > They were Sarin and Mustard Gas, they didn't give the break down as to > > > > > how many of each type... > > > > > > On Sep 11, 7:59 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > 500 shells of specifically what type, in what sort of condition and > > > > > > in > > > > > > what sort of condition were the appropiate delivery systems of said > > > > > > shells? > > > > > > > I don't NEED to try to "keep up", I have you to do it for me. > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 8:07 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe one of the last Reports I saw said something like 500 > > > > > > > Shells > > > > > > > were found... > > > > > > > > Again, try to keep up. > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 5:50 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > OH MY GOD, they had TWO?????? :-) > > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 6:11 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nope, they discovered some with Mustard Gas as well... > > > > > > > > > > Try to keep up holly. > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2:41 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > > > A (as in one) 155mm shell containing Sarin gas????? > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 1:43 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/mariani/2004/mariani052804.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sound of Silence: Iraq's WMDs Found > > > > > > > > > > > > May 28, 2004 > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > by Joe Mariani > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > After spending more than a year attacking the Bush > > > > > > > > > > > administration > > > > > > > > > > > daily for their supposed failure to produce the WMDs that > > > > > > > > > > > everyone -- > > > > > > > > > > > including the United Nations, as well as most leading > > > > > > > > > > > Democrats -- > > > > > > > > > > > believed Saddam had hidden, the Left has suddenly gone > > > > > > > > > > > strangely > > > > > > > > > > > silent on the subject. The "mainstream" media has been > > > > > > > > > > > tiptoeing > > > > > > > > > > > around the discovery of a 155-mm mortar shell containing > > > > > > > > > > > Sarin gas in > > > > > > > > > > > Iraq, the contents of which have been confirmed. The > > > > > > > > > > > shell was used as > > > > > > > > > > > part of an improvised explosive device (IED) on a road > > > > > > > > > > > near the > > > > > > > > > > > Baghdad International Airport, and exploded as it was > > > > > > > > > > > being disarmed. > > > > > > > > > > > > The shell contained three liters of Sarin -- nearly a > > > > > > > > > > > gallon. It was a > > > > > > > > > > > type of shell designed to mix chemical components during > > > > > > > > > > > flight, which > > > > > > > > > > > was why the explosion didn't kill anyone (though two > > > > > > > > > > > soldiers were > > > > > > > > > > > treated for exposure). Three liters of Sarin is enough, > > > > > > > > > > > if the > > > > > > > > > > > components are mixed properly, to realistically kill > > > > > > > > > > > hundreds, and > > > > > > > > > > > potentially thousands. A concentration of 100 milligrams > > > > > > > > > > > of Sarin per > > > > > > > > > > > cubic meter of air is enough to constitute a lethal dose > > > > > > > > > > > for half the > > > > > > > > > > > people breathing it within one minute. > > > > > > > > > > > > This type of chemical warfare shell had never been > > > > > > > > > > > declared by Iraq -- > > > > > > > > > > > it was not even known that Iraq had ever made them. The > > > > > > > > > > > 1999 UNSCOM > > > > > > > > > > > report on Iraq reported that thirty binary/Sarin shells > > > > > > > > > > > were known to > > > > > > > > > > > exist, and stated that all had been accounted for. > > > > > > > > > > > According to > > > > > > > > > > > UNSCOM, "Iraq developed a crude type of binary munition, > > > > > > > > > > > whereby the > > > > > > > > > > > final mixing of the two precursors to the agent was done > > > > > > > > > > > inside the > > > > > > > > > > > munition just before delivery." Someone actually had to > > > > > > > > > > > physically > > > > > > > > > > > pour the components of the Sarin (or other type of > > > > > > > > > > > G-series nerve > > > > > > > > > > > agent) into the shells before they could be fired. At > > > > > > > > > > > least, that's > > > > > > > > > > > how the ones we knew about worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, a previously-unknown type of artillery shell is found > > > > > > > > > > > in Iraq, > > > > > > > > > > > containing an actual, verifiable chemical weapon. This is > > > > > > > > > > > front page > > > > > > > > > > > news, right? Should we expect apologies from formerly > > > > > > > > > > > doubting > > > > > > > > > > > Liberals? Newspapers filled with retractions from > > > > > > > > > > > prominent Democrats? > > > > > > > > > > > Conciliatory visits to President Bush from Jaques Chirac > > > > > > > > > > > and Gerhardt > > > > > > > > > > > Schroeder? Not so fast. Remember: it's an election year. > > > > > > > > > > > Liberals, > > > > > > > > > > > Democrats, terrorists and appeasers all want President > > > > > > > > > > > Bush to lose > > > > > > > > > > > the election so everyone can get back to business as > > > > > > > > > > > usual. Terrorists > > > > > > > > > > > want to get back to their implacable war against Western > > > > > > > > > > > civilisation, > > > > > > > > > > > and the others want to get back to trying to placate > > > > > > > > > > > them. The media, > > > > > > > > > > > as long as we let them get away with it, will only run > > > > > > > > > > > stories that > > > > > > > > > > > attack President Bush and undermine support for him. In > > > > > > > > > > > fact, Liberals > > > > > > > > > > > already have their spin on this Sarin find ready to go. > > > > > > > > > > > The vast > > > > > > > > > > > majority of them -- when you can get them to admit that > > > > > > > > > > > the Sarin and > > > > > > > > > > > the shell are real -- argue that it doesn't matter for > > > > > > > > > > > one of four > > > > > > > > > > > "reasons." > > > > > > > > > > > > A. The shell is old, from before the 1991 Gulf War, so > > > > > > > > > > > it's not what > > > > > > > > > > > we were looking for. > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the cease-fire that suspended the Gulf War depended > > > > > > > > > > > on Saddam's > > > > > > > > > > > handing over to the UN "[a]ll chemical and biological > > > > > > > > > > > weapons and all > > > > > > > > > > > stocks of agents and all related subsystems and > > > > > > > > > > > components and all > > > > > > > > > > > research, development, support and manufacturing > > > > > > > > > > > facilities", this > > > > > > > > > > > shell is precisely what we were looking for, especially > > > > > > > > > > > if it predates > > > > > > > > > > > 1991. This shell and others like it is why the UN passed > > > > > > > > > > > 17 > > > > > > > > > > > resolutions demanding that Saddam disarm. No matter how > > > > > > > > > > > old it was, it > > > > > > > > > > > was still lethal. There is no statute of limitations on > > > > > > > > > > > weapons of > > > > > > > > > > > mass destruction. > > > > > > > > > > > > B. There is only one shell, not a stockpile, so it > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't mean > > > > > > > > > > > anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > This one shell contained enough WMD material to > > > > > > > > > > > potentially kill as > > > > > > > > > > > many people as died on 9/11, all by itself. Is it logical > > > > > > > > > > > to assume > > > > > > > > > > > that this is the only one in existence -- or just wishful > > > > > > > > > > > thinking? > > > > > > > > > > > The fact is that we still don't know how much Sarin Iraq > > > > > > > > > > > actually > > > > > > > > > > > produced. "At first, Iraq told UNSCOM that it had > > > > > > > > > > > produced an > > > > > > > > > > > estimated 250 tons of tabun and 812 tons of sarin. In > > > > > > > > > > > 1995, Iraq > > > > > > > > > > > changed its estimates and reported it had produced only > > > > > > > > > > > 210 tons of > > > > > > > > > > > tabun and 790 tons of sarin." (Yes, that's tons.) At the > > > > > > > > > > > very least, > > > > > > > > > > > it tells us that we haven't nearly finished looking for > > > > > > > > > > > the WMDs that > > > > > > > > > > > Saddam was supposed to surrender, and didn't. Besides... > > > > > > > > > > > a shell > > > > > > > > > > > containing mustard gas was also found. Well, maybe there > > > > > > > > > > > were only two > > > > > > > > > > > WMD shells in all of Iraq. > > > > > > > > > > > > C. Just because Saddam had WMDs after all, it doesn't > > > > > > > > > > > mean Bush didn't > > > > > > > > > > > lie about them. > > > > > > > > > > > > As ridiculous as it sounds, this appears to be the > > > > > > > > > > > instinctive, > > > > > > > > > > > defensive reaction of many Liberals to this news. They so > > > > > > > > > > > badly need > > > > > > > > > > > to believe that President Bush lied in order to > > > > > > > > > > > legitimise their > > > > > > > > > > > hatred of him that they're capable of this sort of > > > > > > > > > > > twisted reasoning. > > > > > > > > > > > The rationale seems to be that WMDs don't count if they > > > > > > > > > > > aren't exactly > > > > > > > > > > > where the CIA told us they were, as if they couldn't be > > > > > > > > > > > moved. > > > > > > > > > > > > D. The terrorists didn't even know it was a chemical > > > > > > > > > > > shell. > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, they do now. And they know where they found it, too. > > > > > > > > > > > > We need to redouble our efforts to stop the terrorists > > > > > > > > > > > and find > > > > > > > > > > > Saddam's WMDs, before they're used to derail the new Iraqi > > > > > > > > > > > government's formation. The media's refusal to give this > > > > > > > > > > > news the > > > > > > > > > > > coverage it deserves can only be due to a calculated > > > > > > > > > > > attempt to reduce > > > > > > > > > > > American support for our efforts in Iraq, including that > > > > > > > > > > > of tracking > > > > > > > > > > > down Saddam's banned weapons. The Left's deliberate > > > > > > > > > > > silence on this > > > > > > > > > > > subject for the purpose of influencing our election > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
