Democrats seek to deny responsibility, yet their fingerprints on all
over the cause of the RE bubble...   Obama if honest would point
partical blame THERE...  That he refuses to be honest, speaks volumes
about his lack of zeal in being an honest reformer...

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0

>>> What happened next was extraordinary. For the first time in history, a 
>>> serious Fannie and Freddie reform bill was passed by the Senate Banking 
>>> Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have 
>>> required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets.

Different World

If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different.
In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper
fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our
oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks
keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market
would likely have not existed.

But the bill didn't become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed
it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be
a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic
opposition, couldn't even get the Senate to vote on the matter.

That such a reckless political stand could have been taken by the
Democrats was obscene even then. Wallison wrote at the time: ``It is a
classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit. The
Democrats and the few Republicans who oppose portfolio limitations
could not possibly do so if their constituents understood what they
were doing.''

Mounds of Materials

Now that the collapse has occurred, the roadblock built by Senate
Democrats in 2005 is unforgivable. Many who opposed the bill
doubtlessly did so for honorable reasons. Fannie and Freddie provided
mounds of materials defending their practices. Perhaps some found
their propaganda convincing.

But we now know that many of the senators who protected Fannie and
Freddie, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd,
have received mind-boggling levels of financial support from them over
the years.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to