jgg, Hmmm, in 2005 we had a Republican in the White House and a Republican controlled Congress. So let me get this straight, in 2005 the Republicans were unwilling or not able to counter anything the minority Democrats wished to do. But since Jan. 2007 the Republicans "can't get anything done" because THEY are now a slim minority.
The only thing that seems to be consistent is Republicans can't get anything done and it's ALWAYS the fault of someone else. On Sep 22, 4:01 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Democrats seek to deny responsibility, yet their fingerprints on all > over the cause of the RE bubble... Obama if honest would point > partical blame THERE... That he refuses to be honest, speaks volumes > about his lack of zeal in being an honest reformer... > > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0 > > >>> What happened next was extraordinary. For the first time in history, a > >>> serious Fannie and Freddie reform bill was passed by the Senate Banking > >>> Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have > >>> required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets. > > Different World > > If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. > In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper > fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our > oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks > keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market > would likely have not existed. > > But the bill didn't become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed > it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be > a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic > opposition, couldn't even get the Senate to vote on the matter. > > That such a reckless political stand could have been taken by the > Democrats was obscene even then. Wallison wrote at the time: ``It is a > classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit. The > Democrats and the few Republicans who oppose portfolio limitations > could not possibly do so if their constituents understood what they > were doing.'' > > Mounds of Materials > > Now that the collapse has occurred, the roadblock built by Senate > Democrats in 2005 is unforgivable. Many who opposed the bill > doubtlessly did so for honorable reasons. Fannie and Freddie provided > mounds of materials defending their practices. Perhaps some found > their propaganda convincing. > > But we now know that many of the senators who protected Fannie and > Freddie, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd, > have received mind-boggling levels of financial support from them over > the years. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
