are you fucking brain dead ? i posted proof that wasila charged rape
vcitims for colecting the evidence that they had been raped while
palin was mayor !

On Sep 25, 11:53 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for absolutely CONFIRMING what everyone who isn't a Palin SMEAR
> merchant knew - Palin had NOTHING to do with charging victims for rape
> kits.  Neither did the city or the Police Department.  If a rape
> victim was charged for a rape kit it was done by the HOSPITAL - unless
> you're going to claim that Palin was directly responsible for the
> accounting and billing practices of the hospital?
>
> The budget game is smoke and mirrors, too - I checked it out myself -
> in 1997, the contractual services budget for the Wasilla PD was $3605;
> in 1998 it was INCREASED to $3800; in 1999 it was INCREASED to
> $4200...there was a reduction in 2000 to $1000.  Unless you're going
> to make the case that Palin decided in the year 2000 to not pay for
> rape kits (which makes no sense, since that was the year the Alaska
> state law went into effect requiring law enforcement agencies to pay
> for them), the Palin rape kit smear is OFFICIALLY DEBUNKED.
>
> Next smear, please!
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:37 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you said there no records of rape victums being charged for rape kits
> > using a quote this web
> > site .
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-alperinsheriff/sarah-palin-instit...
> > as can be seen when you read the next paragraph that isn't
> > true .                       [ On Sunday, CNN's Jessica Yellin claimed
> > to have found no evidence in
> > city records that Sarah Palin was aware that sexual assault victims
> > were being billed for forensic testing. Also, a document released by
> > the City of Wasilla stated that a thorough investigation turned up no
> > records of any bills ever having been sent out for the cost of
> > forensic tests either to victims or to their insurance companies.
>
> > But these investigators weren't looking in the right place.
>
> > During consideration of HB 270, the law Alaska legislators passed to
> > ban the practice of billing sexual assault victims for forensic
> > testing, Lauree Hugonin, then-Director of the Alaska Network on
> > Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (ANDVSA), reported that the
> > charges "resulted from the accounting procedures at the hospitals and
> > not the law enforcement agencies" so it was the hospitals and not the
> > City of Wasilla that was sending out the actual bills. And it was
> > during Palin's administration that hospitals began sending those
> > bills
> > to the victims and their insurance companies rather than to the
> > police
> > department.
>
> > Earlier, I too muddied the waters in my reporting lat week on the
> > budget documents that confirm the timeline. I mistakenly claimed that
> > the exams were paid for by the Wasilla Police Department under the
> > "contingency funding" category of the budget when the exams were
> > actually covered by the "contractual services" line item.
>
> > The budget for the police department's first full fiscal year, FY94,
> > (July 1st, 1993-June 30th, 1994; available here in PDF form)
> > explained
> > that contractual services were "costs for medical blood tests for
> > intoxicated drivers & medical exam/evidence collection for sexual
> > assaults."
>
> > That is the line Palin slashed by 75 percent. It is clear, Palin was
> > either aware of the cut and approved it or she was negligent. The
> > evidence favors the former conclusion. Even as the 2000 Wasilla
> > budget
> > was being submitted, Alaska lawmakers were debating the legislation
> > that would ban the practice of billing the victims. As quoted by CNN,
> > Palin's Deputy Mayor said Palin "would review each department's
> > budget
> > line by line." And as noted in the original post below, the police
> > chief Palin put in power, Fannon, was a strong advocate of the
> > practice of billing the victims and a noted outspoken critic of the
> > legislation that ended the practice. As he told the Mat-Su Valley
> > Frontiersman, "I just don't want to see any more burden put on the
> > taxpayer." ]
>
> > oh and before i forget fuck you !
>
> > On Sep 25, 10:29 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:22 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]
>
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > " LMAO!  You're SUCH a pathetic, LYING scumbag "
> >> > it would seem that discription fits you sunshine .  you posted
> >> > distorted facts about Warsila charging for rape kits when palin was
> >> > mayor
>
> >> Cite the "distorted fact,"  otherwise you're just a low-life lying
> >> scumbag like your scumbag friend.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to